Rishi Sunak has been accused of jeopardizing Britain’s reputation as a climate leader by announcing tax relief measures that will encourage energy companies to invest in fossil fuel extraction during a climate emergency.
Climate groups and opposition politicians chastised the Chancellor for encouraging oil and gas extraction when climate scientists, the United Nations and the International Energy Agency made clear the world must stop new investments in fossil fuels.
“It is foolish and foolish, even by the low standards of this government, to not only allow but in fact encourage the production of new climate-destroying fossil fuels, rather than keeping them firmly in the ground to which they belong,” Green MP Caroline Lucas said. Told The Independent.
“This measure will not only make absolutely no difference to families’ energy bills, [but] any new fossil fuel production acts as a wrecking ball for our net zero climate goals and embarrasses us on the world stage, especially while we are still [retain] the presidency of COP26.
Rishi Sunak announces £15billion cost of living crisis package
The incentive was part of a package of announcements aimed at tackling Britain’s cost of living crisis, which included a temporary 25% levy on oil and gas companies’ windfall profits to help support households in difficulty.
To ensure businesses are not deterred from investing by the new tax, Mr Sunak announced that those who invest in oil and gas extraction will be entitled to significant tax relief on such expenditures.
“The UK government’s position breaks the commitment it made in climate talks last year to phase out subsidies to oil and gas projects,” said Tessa Khan, director of Uplift, a group that campaigns for a fair and fossil fuel free UK. The Independent.
“It’s also completely contradictory when it comes to both getting out of the climate crisis and tackling the cost of living crisis,” she said. “Fossil fuels are at the heart of both, and yet the Chancellor is doubling down and encouraging companies to extract more of them.”
Oil industry analysts and executives have suggested the measure would not fundamentally change the investment strategies of energy firms, as the investment tax break, as well as the tax on their profits, is due to expire in 2025.
“That’s quite a short time for companies considering investing in the North Sea,” said Sam Alvis, head of economics at Green Alliance.
An energy company executive who spoke with The Independent on condition of anonymity, said the announcement would not significantly change the course to net zero, as the company’s investment horizons are mostly five or 10 years.
Nevertheless, the executive described the government’s decision as “messy” and “puzzling”.
“We’re trying to sell a message to our shareholders — that investments and dividends will need to be shaped, focused on securing a net-zero compatible future,” the executive said.
“It clouds the waters, with a mixed message about where government investment should be concentrated.”
Companies can get tax relief for investments in renewable energy through the super-deduction mechanism. This gives companies tax breaks on investing in physical capital.
However, the mechanism can also be used to invest in fossil fuel infrastructure, according to Alvis.
Ami McCarthy, a political campaigner for Greenpeace UK, called the tax relief announced on Thursday “utter stupidity”. “The Chancellor is either in the oil and gas industry’s pocket or just happy to see the world burn,” she said.
Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said to reach net zero the country must go “to hell for leather for renewable energy”.
“We should be cracking down on new exploration because it’s not necessary,” he said. “If you really wanted to get to net zero, if you really wanted to protect us from climate change, if you really wanted to make sure our country was independent from Russia and other people, you would go a lot more into renewable energy. So why don’t they?
A Shell spokesman said the company had “constantly stressed” the importance of a stable environment for long-term investment. “The Chancellor’s proposed tax relief on investing in Britain’s energy future is a key tenet of the new tax,” they said.
The spokesperson confirmed that Shell still intends to spend 75% of its planned £20-25bn investment in the UK energy system on low and zero carbon products and services, including wind offshore, hydrogen, carbon use and storage and electricity. mobility.
A BP spokesperson said: “As we have said before, we see many opportunities to invest in the UK, in energy security today and in the energy transition of tomorrow.
“Naturally, we will now have to consider the impact of both the new levy and the tax relief on our investment projects in the North Sea.”
The Treasury refused to…